# of times viewed working properly?

Displaying 1 to 4 of 4 matches.
jrsower
Member is a Silver contributor and has 2,500 - 9,999 Photo downloadsMember is a contributor and has less than 250 Illustration downloadsExclusive
Posted Wed Jan 5, 2005 2:16PM
It doesn't seem so.
salem
Member is a Silver contributor and has 2,500 - 9,999 Photo downloadsMember is a contributor and has less than 250 Illustration downloads
Posted Wed Jan 5, 2005 2:21PM
I do not think so!!!
PaulCowan
Member is a Diamond contributor and has 25,000 - 199,999 Photo downloadsMember is a contributor and has less than 250 Illustration downloads
Posted Wed Jan 5, 2005 2:47PM
I think it is. However, it doesn't go back to before the new features came on. The initial default value for each image seems to have been no. of views = no. of downloads, then it clocks up from there.
upsidedowndog
Member is a Gold contributor and has 10,000 - 24,999 Photo downloadsMember is a contributor and has less than 250 Illustration downloadsExclusiveExclusive iStockphoto Illustrator
Posted Wed Jan 5, 2005 2:50PM
Which makes perfect sense. If they weren't tracking the # of views before the update then there's no way that they can estimate it. The closest and next-best solution is to just set the views of every picture to the number of downloads because, logically, the picture *must* have been viewed that minimum number of times.
This thread has been locked.
Displaying 1 to 4 of 4 matches.
Not a member?Join