Exclusive- Photos Vs Non-Photo Art

Displaying 1 to 2 of 2 matches.
StanRohrer
Member is a Diamond contributor and has 25,000 - 199,999 Photo downloadsMember is a contributor and has less than 250 Flash downloadsMember is a contributor and has less than 250 Illustration downloadsExclusive
Posted Thu Jan 6, 2005 6:03PM
While reading the exclusivity program page it occured to me that it seems to interchange the word "images" and "photographs". It also uses the word "photographers".

I guess the few motion video uploads might still be construed as included. After seeing some wonderful vectors and illustrations and flash objects in the uploads, I wonder how the exclusivity program applies to those non-photo "supply artists".

I suspect there may be a legalese oops here? Or is iStock really only interested in exclusivity in photos?
upsidedowndog
Member is a Gold contributor and has 10,000 - 24,999 Photo downloadsMember is a contributor and has less than 250 Flash downloadsMember is a contributor and has less than 250 Illustration downloadsExclusiveExclusive iStockphoto IllustratorMember has had a submission accepted to the Designer SpotlightMask of the Diablo Azul - Member has won between 1 and 3 Steel Cage matches
Posted Thu Jan 6, 2005 6:25PM
Exclusivity is by Artist not by the content they upload. I'm guessing that "images", "photographs" & "photographers" are legacy terminology, but is intended to encompass a member, not the type of content they create.
This thread has been locked.
Displaying 1 to 2 of 2 matches.
Not a member?Join
Cart (0)