Attention: These forums are no longer active. The iStock Contributor forums have moved to the Contributor Community site.

Subtle change

First pagePrevious pageof 2
Displaying 21 to 23 of 23 matches.
sylvanworksCLOSED
Member is a Diamond contributor and has 25,000 - 199,999 Photo downloads
Posted Fri Jan 28, 2005 10:22AM

So, if they use galleries for breeding grounds for CD's, would the gallery makers get some kind of credit on the CD?



That is a completely bogus rumor (created in this very thread) ... let's not even give that any legs.
bortonia
Member is a Silver contributor and has 2,500 - 9,999 Photo downloadsMember is a Diamond contributor and has 25,000 - 199,999 Illustration downloadsExclusiveExclusive iStockphoto IllustratorThis user has the power to wield the BanHammer, a weapon forged in the fires of hell for that get-off-my-planet quality you can't get anywhere else. You betta reckonize.Forum Moderator
Posted Fri Jan 28, 2005 10:27PM
I think that you should always put down 3 categories, no matter what... You never know how a user will 'stumble' onto your photos. Why give up the chance at another sale?

There are plenty of generic categories offered, in case some aren't specific enough (for example, the vector categories- not too many choices). But i'll file mine under 'miscellaneous', just in case. It's good business IMHO
KimsCreativeHub
Member is a Gold contributor and has 10,000 - 24,999 Photo downloadsMember is a contributor and has less than 250 Video downloadsMember is a Gold contributor and has 10,000 - 24,999 Illustration downloads
Posted Fri Jan 28, 2005 11:58PM
I Think galleries would be the best, they are well done and relevant they trump any bad keywords, and I agree about the categories.
This thread has been locked.
First pagePrevious pageof 2
Displaying 21 to 23 of 23 matches.
Not a member?Join