Posted By ducksandwich:
According to the CV a teenager is defined as someone between the ages of 13 - 17. Since yr subject here is 19 they are therefore a young adult making the inspector's KW removals right on the nose.
Dearest Mr. Duck (David),
WHile we can all appreciate/commiserate about the oddities/uniqueness of the CV I wonder if you would indulge me a moment and answer a few questions that perhaps others may be asking as well?
1. Is a buyer always/ever aware of these CV peculiarities to age definitions?
2. If No be answered to #1 I suppose it could be argued in its defense that if they search for an '18 yr old' it will lead them to young adults but would it not be true if they searched using the 'Teenagers Only' route would they not miss this image and all those aged 18-19 which might be exactly what they are after?
3. On the rationale behind the CV criteria is it being assumed that since teenagers covers mostly ages 13-17 and they generally look more teenish that it'll get the job done and any 'misses' of 18-19 yr old are just exclusions to the rule created?
4. Why cannot the CV cover both bases and overlap to that the older looking teens perhaps aged 16-19 can be found under young adults (if they looked that way) and that youngish looking ones aged 18-19 could be found under Teenagers Only? Yes I realize some could/would/shouldn't spam with this 'system but if keyworded accurately according to what it actually looks like as opposed to just numbers it should/would/will prove to be more beneficial to buyers and contributors alike no?
5. As a follow up to #4, If the Getty adherence to factual data can be stretched to include CV specific rules such as making 18-19 yr olds 'non-teens' can't the same rule work backwards so the younger actual ages that happen to look older are included in the young adult searches?
6. Is a completely different category search term needed to make sure there are no misses or a prompt that asks (as much as I HATE these interruptions to the process sometimes) 'Did you mean-Teenagers 13-17? Or Teens 18-19? Possible new search terms-Teen Adults? Adultish Looking Teens? Youthful Older People? OK getting silly there.Not with the question just some of the choices.
7. I'm a little confused stlll despite asking so many questions whether the data needs to be factually accurate as the world understands it (ie. 18-19 = teens) or visually accurate (ie. many 18-19 yr olds look like they're 15-16 because of the variables God created into our maturity rates.)
While I realize that some frown upon asking ANY questions about 'protocol' as such, Please (those maybe so inclined) don't interpret these questions as somehow challenging authority or the system as I've been accused of in the past. Its just an objective review of the data the CV presents us and the reasoning (if known) behind it so we can understand it better. Its how my mind functions. I work best and believe many do when we know the Whys of Life.
Thanks David!