![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Tue Nov 6, 2012 7:30AM | Interesting, Canon has just anounced a new 24-70L f/4 iS lens. Seems to overlap with other offerings. It will be interesting to see how this compares to the 24-105L f/4 iS and the new 24-70L f/2.8 in terms of image quality etc.. Will they ulitimately discontinue the 24-105L? (Edited on 2012-11-06 07:32:57 by wdstock) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Tue Nov 6, 2012 8:05PM | Well, considering how many 70-200s they sell all at the same time, i don't think you can predict the demise of the 24-105. It definitely is an interesting development. (Edited on 2012-11-06 20:08:33 by TexPhoto) |
![]() ![]() Posted Tue Nov 6, 2012 9:20PM | I think the 35 f2 IS is more interesting. |
![]() ![]() Posted Tue Nov 6, 2012 11:38PM | New 24-70 is going to need top class performance to justify the price tag. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Wed Nov 7, 2012 6:26PM | ^ Agreed. Looking at Canon's MTF charts, it does not appear to be as good as the 24-70L f/2.8 II lens. That's disappointing, but real world may prove differently. It nees to significantly outperform the 24-105L to make sense. |
![]() ![]() Posted Wed Nov 7, 2012 7:00PM | I've seen a suggestion they might discontinue the 24-105. If so, they will become very sought after in the used market. I need to get one, quick, before prices go up. |
![]() Posted Fri Nov 9, 2012 7:51AM | I was never impressed with the 24-70. 2.8, neither the 16-35. 2.8. not even their II models. Both produce somewhat soft results and especially when extended. The 24-105, is a good allrounder and workhorse. There is definetely some truth in the saying, Nikon for wides and Canon for teles |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Fri Jan 4 11:53AM | For those interested, here are some early test results for the new Canon 24-70 f/4L lens. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Fri Jan 4 1:09PM | Looks pretty lame to me for the price. |
![]() ![]() Posted Fri Jan 4 1:11PM | Now if only they could find a way to squeeze f2.8 out of the 24-105, that would be something very special |
![]() ![]() Posted Wed Jan 16 5:26AM | Ken Rockwell has reviewed this new lens and speaks highly of it - apart from the price which he reckons (like everyone else) is way too high. Looks like a great lens to replace the 24-70 F2.8 in order to reduce weight, but the high price makes it a no-no. |