![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:21PM | Since the return of zoom functionality is on indefinite hold, how about a smaller watermark pattern that doesn't obscure the image so much? The big "iStockphoto" really hurts some images. A smaller repetitive pattern would serve the purpose of protecting the image, and at the same time make it less difficult for customers to determine the suitability of the image for their purpose. (Edited on 2012-11-23 21:25:15 by wdstock) |
![]() ![]() Posted Wed Dec 5, 2012 10:43AM | good idea. |
![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Fri Dec 7, 2012 7:03AM | Posted By wdstock: Since the return of zoom functionality is on indefinite hold, how about a smaller watermark pattern that doesn't obscure the image so much? The big "iStockphoto" really hurts some images. A smaller repetitive pattern would serve the purpose of protecting the image, and at the same time make it less difficult for customers to determine the suitability of the image for their purpose. (Edited on 2012-11-23 21:25:15 by wdstock) Zoom will be back |