Posted Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:51AM
hi all, I received this file as rejected. Is it because of over exposure making it look a little washed out?
We found the overall composition of this file's lighting could be improved. Some of the technical aspects that can all limit the usefulness of a file are:
-Direct on-camera flash and/or flash fall-off (bright subject, dark background)
-Harsh lighting with blown-out highlights that lack details and/or distracting shadows
- Distracting lens flares
-Incorrect white balance
For information about iStock lighting standards please see:
For more information on iStock Lighting Standards, please see:
Lighting and Shadows:
Setting up your own home studio:
Custom White Balance:
If you require further explanation regarding this rejection, please visit our critique forum for immediate peer to peer feedback. To visit the critique forum please see:
thoughts and opinions would be great appreciated... thanks
(Edited on 2012-11-27 11:16:08 by donald_gruener)
Posted Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:30AM
Read the sticky at the top of the forum to see how to get a critique from this forum.
As a rejection, your file is not accessible from here.
Posted Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:18AM
The light is flat and the composition is awkward, but please have a read through the Read This First thread as Roger ^ suggested and post up a full size file for us to provide a more in-depth analysis. Thanks!
Posted Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:32PM
nah its ok... agree with the decision made... its no the best photo. I am here to learn and submit better quality photos. Thanks for the feedback provided...