PHOTO: Lighting and Property Release

Displaying 1 to 7 of 7 matches.
r_gianluca
Member is a contributor and has less than 250 Photo downloads
Posted Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:55AM
http://roninclan.altervista.org/watermark.jpgHi, please help me to know why this file was rejected. I can reupload it.I found the chormatic aberrations...but i can't find these "writing" that need a property release!We found the overall composition of this file's lighting could be improved. Some of the technical aspects that can all limit the usefulness of a file are:-Flat/dull colors-Direct on-camera flash and/or flash fall-off (bright subject, dark background)-Harsh lighting with blown-out highlights that lack details and/or distracting shadows- Distracting lens flares-Incorrect white balanceFor information about iStock lighting standards please see: http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=524For more information on iStock Lighting Standards, please see:http://www.istockphoto.com/tutorial_2.2_lighting.phpRelated Articles: Lighting and Shadows:http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=46Setting up your own home studio:http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=14 Custom White Balance:http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=95 Decent Exposure:http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=40 If you require further explanation regarding this rejection, please visit our critique forum for immediate peer to peer feedback. To visit the critique forum please see:http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_threads.php?forumid=26This file contains legible information such as names, signatures, license plates, phone numbers, identification numbers, etc. Due to concerns relating to privacy and related property rights, we cannot accept this file unless this information is removed, or a property release is obtained.iStock Property Release:http://www.istockphoto.com/docs/propertyrelease.pdfIf you require further explanation regarding this rejection, please forward this message and your questions to Contributor Relations (artists@istockphoto.com)This file has unacceptable levels of chromatic aberration, also referred to as 'purple fringing' or could also be a red glow. This fringing is normally apparent around the edges of swift color shifts like dark colored leaves against a bright sky or reflective surfaces. If you require further explanation regarding this rejection, please submit a ticket to Scout (http://www.istockphoto.com/contact_ticket.php). For information about iStock lighting standards please see: http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=524For more information on iStock Lighting Standards, please see:http://www.istockphoto.com/tutorial_2.2_lighting.phpRelated Articles: Lighting and Shadows:http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=46Setting up your own home studio:http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=14 Custom White Balance:http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=95 Decent Exposure:http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=40 If you require further explanation regarding this rejection, please visit our critique forum for immediate peer to peer feedback. To visit the critique forum please see:http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_threads.php?forumid=26 (Edited on 2012-11-30 11:00:56 by r_gianluca)

(Edited on 2012-11-30 11:02:39 by r_gianluca)
r_gianluca
Member is a contributor and has less than 250 Photo downloads
Posted Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:03AM
I got problems with the post editor....it does not work well with the scripts...by the way here is the link to the filehttp://roninclan.altervista.org/watermark.jpg
Mijau
Member is a contributor and has less than 250 Photo downloads
Posted Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:42AM

There is a number visible (upper part of the image near center)


CA!!!
cmannphoto
Member is a Gold contributor and has 10,000 - 24,999 Photo downloadsExclusive
Posted Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:57AM

Yep there is a part number on the hydraulic cylinder, along with a lot of CA


boom
r_gianluca
Member is a contributor and has less than 250 Photo downloads
Posted Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:54PM
I didn't noticed it! I will try to remove the CA also. Thanks a lot!
r_gianluca
Member is a contributor and has less than 250 Photo downloads
Posted Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:17PM

I sended again the picture with all the above correction, and after a long work i sent it again and i got a second rejecton, now i can't upload it anymore.


By the way i want to understand why they didn't accepted it...as it was taken with similar shoots at the same light conditio that were accepted.


2nd InspectionWe found the overall composition of this file's lighting could be improved. Some of the technical aspects that can all limit the usefulness of a file are:-Flat/dull colors-Direct on-camera flash and/or flash fall-off (bright subject, dark background)-Harsh lighting with blown-out highlights that lack details and/or distracting shadows- Distracting lens flares-Incorrect white balance.


Here is the link (sorry again but the toolbar of the chat box does not work) : http://roninclan.altervista.org/rejected.jpg

(Edited on 2012-12-10 17:33:56 by r_gianluca)
donald_gruener
Member is a Diamond contributor and has 25,000 - 199,999 Photo downloadsMember is a contributor and has less than 250 Illustration downloadsExclusive
Posted Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:03PM
The lighting is borderline, so it's not unusual that some in the series would fall on either side of the accept/reject line. In this one, much of what we see is the shadow side of the various elements. The composition is a bit awkward and not enormously likely to be very useful to designers - it's hard to even know what we're looking at here and there is a large out of focus mass dominating the foreground.

I know it certainly is frustrating to address a rejection issue only to have the resubmission rejected for another issue, but that is always a danger with images that skirt on the edge of accept/reject...it's always possible that next time around, the next Inspector will find that it shouldn't be resubmitted at all. You can always try Scout if you feel strongly that the image should have been accepted.
This thread has been locked.
Displaying 1 to 7 of 7 matches.
Not a member?Join