![]() Posted Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:43PM | When exporting in LR3 the default resolution in image size seeems to be 240. What should I be using for this setting when exporting JPGS for submission to Istock Thx Marco |
![]() ![]() Posted Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:58PM | Don't think it matters but istock from what i remember suggested it at 300ppi. This might help. http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=1054 (Edited on 2012-12-14 19:01:39 by Feverstockphoto) |
![]() ![]() Posted Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:19PM | I use native 240 to istock with no problem |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:16AM | 300 makes things easier for the end user, and client relations, but it doesn't affect anyone but the person who needs to print the final output. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:32AM | There are few, if any, clients who would use an image at 240dpi. 300dpi is a standard resolution for print and, therefore, probably your best option. As Kelvin said; there are complaints voiced in the forums (and to Client Relations) that "I've been sold the wrong resolution!" They've seen the resolution at 300dpi on the file's page - see File Size when set to Inches then Medium and above all show physical size at 300dpi - and when they download it's different. Sticking at 300dpi saves such minor problems. |
![]() ![]() Posted Fri Dec 28, 2012 3:11PM | This is interesting to me as how would the cust know the resolution until he purchased the file? Could that be a possible answer to some file refunds. I've never heard this addressed before and it's a simple thing to change the file to 300, for them to do, or for me to do. i never looked at the "inches" option on the file...it does show 300 dpi, thanks van! (Edited on 2012-12-28 15:12:27 by DebbiSmirnoff) (Edited on 2012-12-28 15:15:49 by DebbiSmirnoff) |