![]() ![]() Posted Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:33PM | Hello All, This is my first critique request. Here is the photo: Below link to bigger size. http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/7788/kreda3.jpg Reason of rejection is: We found the overall composition of this file's lighting could be improved. Some of the technical aspects that can all limit the usefulness of a file are: -Flat/dull colors -Direct on-camera flash and/or flash fall-off (bright subject, dark background) -Harsh lighting with blown-out highlights that lack details and/or distracting shadows - Distracting lens flares -Incorrect white balance Could you help me to understand what exactly is reason for this rejection? (Edited on 2012-12-30 14:33:30 by domto) (Edited on 2012-12-30 14:57:20 by domto) |
![]() ![]() Posted Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:38PM | I'm sure it's hard to say anithing from this size. Is this the origianl size of the uploaded file? (Edited on 2012-12-30 14:39:59 by pixelfit) |
![]() ![]() Posted Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:41PM | This is link for bigger size http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/7788/kreda3.jpg 1600x1200 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:56PM | Distracting shadows seems the most likely of the 'lighting' rejects. The colours seem a little less intense on bottom right of image? REGARDS |
![]() ![]() Posted Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:59PM | Yes I know, shadows, but without these shadows no picture in this case. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:51AM | Posted By domto: This is link for bigger size http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/7788/kreda3.jpg 1600x1200 Your original upload was 2592 x 3872. At the significantly smaller size you've posted here we may not be able to see the detail that the Inspector saw. In this type of light, there are often areas of blown or nearly blown highlights at 100% that are less apparent when downsampled. That may not be the case with your image, but it's impossible to reliably comment on the rejection without seeing exactly what the Inspector saw. That's why we ask that critique requests always be accompananied by the same file you uploaded. Thanks! |
![]() ![]() Posted Tue Jan 1 7:12AM | OK, understood. Below link for original file.This is second rejected file in this subject. https://www.dropbox.com/s/4zhw6uqzi363853/kreda-2.JPG And link for similar corrected picture. Better? https://www.dropbox.com/s/nhgwr55y7qetjkb/kreda_1-1.JPG (Edited on 2013-01-01 13:21:35 by domto) |
![]() Posted Tue Jan 1 9:41AM | For me ERROR403 |
![]() ![]() Posted Tue Jan 1 1:23PM | Sorry, now should be ok. |
![]() Posted Wed Jan 2 5:36PM | You sent a different picture from the one that was inspected. By the way i think that a little more of color saturation would be good. In your original picture the colors are really flat. Here is what i think would be a good improvement: http://roninclan.altervista.org/difference.jpg Also the shadows can limit the use on microstock photography. By the way i like the composition. (Edited on 2013-01-02 17:37:05 by r_gianluca) (Edited on 2013-01-02 17:39:10 by r_gianluca) (Edited on 2013-01-03 03:56:10 by kelvinjay) ETA: Please don't post images wider than the forums will easily accommodate. 600px is about the max. (Edited on 2013-01-03 03:57:45 by kelvinjay) |
![]() ![]() Posted Thu Jan 3 6:35AM | Thanks for the support! |