PHOTO: Color chalk

Displaying 1 to 11 of 11 matches.
domto
Member is a Bronze contributor and has 250 - 2,499 Photo downloadsExclusive
Posted Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:33PM
Hello All,

 
This is my first critique request. Here is the photo:

file_thumbview_approve


 
Below link to bigger size.


http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/7788/kreda3.jpg

 

Reason of rejection is:

We found the overall composition of this file's lighting could be improved. Some of the technical aspects that can all limit the usefulness of a file are:

-Flat/dull colors
-Direct on-camera flash and/or flash fall-off (bright subject, dark background)
-Harsh lighting with blown-out highlights that lack details and/or distracting shadows
- Distracting lens flares
-Incorrect white balance


 
Could you help me to understand what exactly is reason for this rejection?

(Edited on 2012-12-30 14:33:30 by domto)

(Edited on 2012-12-30 14:57:20 by domto)
pixelfit
Member is a Gold contributor and has 10,000 - 24,999 Photo downloadsExclusive
Posted Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:38PM
I'm sure it's hard to say anithing from this size. Is this the origianl size of the uploaded file?

(Edited on 2012-12-30 14:39:59 by pixelfit)
domto
Member is a Bronze contributor and has 250 - 2,499 Photo downloadsExclusive
Posted Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:41PM
This is link for bigger size

http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/7788/kreda3.jpg

1600x1200
kbwills
Member is a Silver contributor and has 2,500 - 9,999 Photo downloadsMember is a contributor and has less than 250 Video downloadsExclusiveExclusive iStockphoto Videographer
Posted Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:56PM

Distracting shadows seems the most likely of the 'lighting' rejects.


The colours seem a little less intense on bottom right of image?


REGARDS
domto
Member is a Bronze contributor and has 250 - 2,499 Photo downloadsExclusive
Posted Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:59PM
Yes I know, shadows, but without these shadows no picture in this case.
donald_gruener
Member is a Diamond contributor and has 25,000 - 199,999 Photo downloadsMember is a contributor and has less than 250 Illustration downloadsExclusive
Posted Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:51AM

Posted By domto:
This is link for bigger size

http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/7788/kreda3.jpg

1600x1200


Your original upload was 2592 x 3872. At the significantly smaller size you've posted here we may not be able to see the detail that the Inspector saw. In this type of light, there are often areas of blown or nearly blown highlights at 100% that are less apparent when downsampled. That may not be the case with your image, but it's impossible to reliably comment on the rejection without seeing exactly what the Inspector saw. That's why we ask that critique requests always be accompananied by the same file you uploaded. Thanks!
domto
Member is a Bronze contributor and has 250 - 2,499 Photo downloadsExclusive
Posted Tue Jan 1, 2013 7:12AM
OK, understood.
Below link for original file.This is second rejected file in this subject.


https://www.dropbox.com/s/4zhw6uqzi363853/kreda-2.JPG


 


And link for similar corrected picture. Better?


https://www.dropbox.com/s/nhgwr55y7qetjkb/kreda_1-1.JPG

(Edited on 2013-01-01 13:21:35 by domto)
Mijau
Member is a contributor and has less than 250 Photo downloads
Posted Tue Jan 1, 2013 9:41AM
For me ERROR403
domto
Member is a Bronze contributor and has 250 - 2,499 Photo downloadsExclusive
Posted Tue Jan 1, 2013 1:23PM
Sorry, now should be ok.
r_gianluca
Member is a contributor and has less than 250 Photo downloads
Posted Wed Jan 2, 2013 5:36PM
You sent a different picture from the one that was inspected. By the way i think that a little more of color saturation would be good. In your original picture the colors are really flat.

Here is what i think would be a good improvement:

http://roninclan.altervista.org/difference.jpg


Also the shadows can limit the use on microstock photography.

By the way i like the composition.

(Edited on 2013-01-02 17:37:05 by r_gianluca)

(Edited on 2013-01-02 17:39:10 by r_gianluca)

(Edited on 2013-01-03 03:56:10 by kelvinjay)

ETA: Please don't post images wider than the forums will easily accommodate. 600px is about the max.

(Edited on 2013-01-03 03:57:45 by kelvinjay)
domto
Member is a Bronze contributor and has 250 - 2,499 Photo downloadsExclusive
Posted Thu Jan 3, 2013 6:35AM
Thanks for the support!
This thread has been locked.
Displaying 1 to 11 of 11 matches.
Not a member?Join