![]() Posted Mon Jan 28 8:05PM | https://dl.dropbox.com/u/38893062/Blank%20bordered%20copy.jpg I saw something like this with flowery border that seemed to me to be geared toward a female audience. So I thought I'd try something geared more toward a male/hunter/animal lover person. This is the first time I've ever tried to create something like this and I don't know if my skills are even in the ballpark. I kind of guessed at a few things along the way. In addition to quality, is the size ok? I just used the default size that came up in the blank file creation box, is that ok? I'm assuming this would be classified a photo (since I used a photo of mine to create it) but is that even right? Do I need to put a note to the inspector that it is my photo I used? Thanks, Ernie (Edited on 2013-01-28 20:22:37 by kelvinjay) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Mon Jan 28 8:21PM | I'd say that this kind of thing can often be far better produced by a designer. I'd leave it up to the buyer to create such basic borders and designs from isolated objects. IStock can be very strict over accepting designs and composites and I just don't really feel there's much added value here by having your arrangement of this fairly random subject. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Mon Jan 28 9:45PM | You basically have one small image replicated over and over. iStock does not accept such simple designs. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Tue Jan 29 7:46AM | Posted By erniedecker: I'm assuming this would be classified a photo (since I used a photo of mine to create it) but is that even right? Do I need to put a note to the inspector that it is my photo I used? Thanks, Ernie Never, ever think of submitting something like this again |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Tue Jan 29 11:33AM | Posted By kelvinjay: I'd say that this kind of thing can often be far better produced by a designer. I'd leave it up to the buyer to create such basic borders and designs from isolated objects. IStock can be very strict over accepting designs and composites and I just don't really feel there's much added value here by having your arrangement of this fairly random subject. Posted By slobo: You basically have one small image replicated over and over. iStock does not accept such simple designs. Posted By sjlocke: Posted By erniedecker: I'm assuming this would be classified a photo (since I used a photo of mine to create it) but is that even right? Do I need to put a note to the inspector that it is my photo I used? Thanks, Ernie Never, ever think of submitting something like this again ;). Seriously, it's a cut and past of a tiny image repeatedly around a white box. Zero chance of acceptance. Yup, yup, and yup... sorry. Thank you for asking, it's actually a helpful thread, good for people to know. |
![]() Posted Tue Jan 29 2:31PM | OK, no problem. Don't know til you try.... |