Posted Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:50PM
I think there is a spam word which has over taken 'woman', 'business', 'sexy' and 'goldfish'. I think it is Nobody.
I was doing a search and people were cropping up in the nobody search. How can this be right? I even tried the nobody + woman search and guess what, there were people.
Maybe I am wrong but surely we think more of our models than to call them nobodies
Posted Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:30PM
And I'll bet many, if not most of those words were added recently with the thread about relevant keywords.
Posted Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:32PM
People shouldn't be applying it to a photo with somebody! *sigh*
Posted Thu Sep 18, 2008 1:26AM
Posted By lostinbids:
I was doing a search and people were cropping up in the nobody search. How can this be right?
Were they 'head only' shots? No body?
Posted Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:18AM
Posted Thu Sep 18, 2008 6:16AM
In a search for Invisible by BM, only a fun series by 6x4 really fit the keyword.
So we have people who are nobodies, and invisibles which are perfectly visible (unless you count that you can't see what is inside a closed box, which I suppose was the thinking?)