![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:14AM | Got the recent April 27, 2009 issue of Time magazine in the mail on Saturday. On the cover is robertlamphoto's money jar photo. http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20090427,00.html |
![]() ![]() Posted Tue Apr 21, 2009 6:16AM | Nice! Congratulations! And only 2 downloads on that file. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:13AM | Congrats!! Frame that one |
![]() Posted Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:24AM | I second redhumv's comment, frame that cover. That is awesome to be on the cover of Time. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Sat Apr 25, 2009 4:11PM | Great find! Very impressive. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:50PM | Awesome! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Fri May 1, 2009 1:24PM | Great job! Even better, when I clicked the link Istock has an ad on that page! (Edited on 2009-05-01 13:24:38 by HKPNC) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Sun May 3, 2009 2:17AM | Wow! Quite a use. You did get an extended license for an editorial use over 500,000, right? |
![]() Posted Tue May 5, 2009 6:18PM | That's one heck of a client!! Congratulations. Guess I'll have to buy it |
![]() Posted Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:37PM | look like my photos. LOL. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Sun Jul 26, 2009 9:04AM | This article in the 'Photo Business News & Forum' about this Time front cover, points the finger at iStockphoto in the usual way, complete with the normal major inaccuracy or two. Many of the comments are even worse than the article itself. The article's main claim is that by getting the image from iStock, Time Magazine got their cover photo at a 99% discount of their usual (guessed) price. |
![]() Posted Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:41PM | Thank you for all comments |
![]() ![]() ![]() Posted Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:56PM | Posted By resonants: This article in the 'Photo Business News & Forum' about this Time front cover, points the finger at iStockphoto in the usual way, complete with the normal major inaccuracy or two. Many of the comments are even worse than the article itself. The article's main claim is that by getting the image from iStock, Time Magazine got their cover photo at a 99% discount of their usual (guessed) price. Hope I'm not the only one who finds it ironic that this publisher has illustrated his commercial blog with what is evidently a scanned copy of the picture in Time magazine. Nevermind it's a hot-link to an iStock location. If he is so concerned with photographers getting paid for their work, the very least he could do is buy a copy of the picture in question from iStock and post it legitimately on his blog. |
Posted Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:22PM | Let the whiner soak his pillow tonight and let's move on. Congratulations Robert! This is one heck of a page for your portfolio for sure... |