80's :)

I'm posting this here not knowing if there is a better way to solve this problem.
First I want to say that I appreciate the work of inspectors when they reject an image that needs some sort of corrective action. I've learned to thank and not to complain about it, because that will produce better work and better results for everybody. Having said that, it just annoys me to get rejected files because the inspector did not pay attention to the note for attached releases (model and property) and the reason for the rejection is that the file needs a property release (which was attached). The files were submitted with a note to the inspector on the image description field that reads: INSPECTOR NOTE: MODEL AND PROPERTY RELEASES ATTACHED and I did it to prevent the dreaded rejection. Doesn't matter, the note was overlooked, the files were re-submitted (with a second note below the first one and then they were accepted).
Hope this helps to avoid unnecessary rejections. Thanks

Great, thanks George.

The lazy man is selling up a storm at the moment. 12 sales already in 2012. He was averaging 5 or 6 sales a month last year.

As Elaine said, I'm in the DFW area, and up for get-togethers from time to time. figure8photos is up near you too.
 

Is it possible to style a link in css to show a different color when you are on the page that corresponsa to that link?

This one has been picked up by Oak Mountain Jewellery's facebook page.

Oak tree at dawn:


(Edited on 2012-02-12 11:51:20 by Whiteway)

Loving your return Beat!!  It reminds me of an image from my Art history book! Well done!

Try using "serious" as a keyword instead of "worried".

No I know, I respect your opinion and was worried that if you said that,it might not be too far from the truth. Lets hope your wrong! it baffles me as to why if business is gd and you have tons of contributors asking for more stuff to help them grow and develop,you would not fill them to the brim with what their asking?


That all being said we are in the midst of changes and gd things may well be on their way as we speak!

Danke für die Info!

Bonjour à tous


Ma question est la suivante:


J'ai bien compris que si j'apparaîs sur la photo, je dois remplir une autorisation du sujet en mon nom mais comme ce n'est pas moi qui prend la photo, dois je envoyer un autre formulaire pour la personne qui est derriére l'objectif, si oui lequel?


D'autre part, sur une autorisation du sujet, la signature du témoin est-elle un acte obligatoire?

Many thanks guys,  much apreciated.  I agree it looks flat but am very wary of doing any adjustments.  I will certainly take your advice and see how it goes.


Regards

I'm interested.

Yes, we could use the word Eves added to soffit,


Also I need the word Template (it showed up in blue in deepmeta so I'm not sure it's a keyword).......


meaning....They are creating a template to make my granite countertops.

If companies have a say then it is not editorial, it is propaganda.

Congratulations! Really cute file. There were so many amazing entries in January.

I use mostly LR , sometimes DXO if CA is very stubborn.

Well, who can pass up an invitation from simonkr?? I hear the Adriatic coastline is stunning!

While working on a recent project I was thinking about the photo side of stock where a person in the background of an image who is so blurry they are unidentifiable doesnt need a release. How about the the following? This project is an ambient spacey soundscape for which I wanted some radio transmission effects in the background. To get these I recorded an old police scanner tuned to a distant air traffic control tower. The voices, at that point, were already almost unintelligible. With a little added radio hiss and filtering I made them unintelligible, which is what I was going for. So, would this project be allowed without the release for the unidentifiable and incomprehensible radio transmissions?

I add old files to PP from time to time as they reach 18 months mark, and recently I do not see them appearing on TS, the number of my files there is stuck on 818. Is everything ok with the connector, does anybody know?

^^ Thanks for your advice, I couldn't believe what I was reading, even down here in Africa this kind of perverse logic isn't trotted out anymore.


I'm going to leave things be for a month or two, but I'll certainly get back to contributor relations stand my ground if there's no movement from iStock and I decide to remove them. 


I've always had fantastic support from contributor relations, btw, so I managed to grin and bear just this one weird response.

It's an App in the Android Market that looks quite useful for unplanned stock shoots. The description claims its approved by Getty but is it? Can't find any info.


Anyone help?

....And if somebody has material for my lightbox( not only audio) i am happy to add it :)